John Benjamin Cassel, M.Des., B.Sc.
John Benjamin Cassel,
M.Des., B.Sc. is an
R&D Consultant at Wolfram|Alpha LLC.
John is a machine-learning and design research practitioner interested
in
real-time discovery and planning problems involving severe risks with
uncertain mitigation.
His current research problems include:
Eliciting causal impacts: How does even one appropriately elicit
scenarios for governing risky situations with multiple stakeholders,
when the participants potentially have all kinds of differences in their
worldview? A related question is how does one represent and display the
conflicting accounts emerging from the testimony of multiple
stakeholders?
Rendering causal impacts, emerging changing behavior: How do you
aggregate nearly insignificant small-scale individual choices into
long-term, large-scale, high-impact behaviors in a way that’s useful for
making situational decisions? For example, how do you map a particular
purchase as an exemplar of larger-scale trajectories of materials,
energy, and waste? As another example, how do you map a given meal
choice on to the nutrition and fitness of a region? And how do you
render that information in a manner that makes it immediately useful?
Emerging cradle-to-cradle: One interesting special case of this
is the
emerging cradle-to-cradle problem. What’s the minimum amount of
information one needs to capture to make emergent cradle-to-cradle
behavior feasible? Cradle-to-cradle issues interest John quite a bit,
because of the temporal effect on values: no matter the social values a
given society might determine is appropriate, using up a resource
thermodynamically will affect future societies with different social
arrangement. This leads to some frighteningly easy decision-theoretic
planning perspective: non-discounted marginal loss spikes to infinity.
Making causal information “portable”: Even beyond representing
causal
information in the first place, there are some challenges in
making it “portable”. Everyone knows there are active volcanos in
Iceland, yet nobody can be practically expected to use that information
to assist their business travel planning. How do you pull in what you
already “know”? Also, how does one assemble this common knowledge? Can
it be mined from text?
Design from the perspective of statistical processes: How do you
know
when your understanding of potential causal forces is complete enough?
John
thinks that design and ethnography teach us to look further than we
otherwise might (to bias exploration), and there could be interesting
discoveries in how design works from a statistical perspective (similar
to recent work in cognitive developmental psychology and the psychology
of science). Further, he suspects this kind of analysis may have some
interesting things to say about the validation of foresight work. In
particular, he hopes that there will be something to the approach of
looking at priors over structures (in the style of Josh Tenenbaum’s
research).
Making design and diagrams “portable”: John thinks of design as
being very project-driven: you try a bunch of things, you finish one of them
to completion, and then you take whatever you learn, but the models that
you often build end up in the trash. In machine learning, there’s a
problem called “transfer learning”, where you ask given that you know
one kind of statistics, what can you infer about a different
relationship. There’s possibly a design analog, where after you’ve
illustrated one set of relationships, how do you (or somebody else)
recover those connections for a different project?
Materialist foundations for ontology: What would a computational
implementation of a materialist ontology (i.e. Manuel DeLanda’s work)
look like?
John earned his B.Sc. in Computer Science with Honors at the University
of
Illinois. He earned his M.Des. in Strategic Foresight and Innovation at
OCAD University with the thesis of
Addressing Risk Governance Deficits through Scenario Modeling
Practices.
Read
Scenarios as a Site for Stigmergic Commons.
Follow his
Twitter feed.
Read his
LinkedIn profile.